Purpose-built for grant writers
Write grant proposals that hold up to review.
Grantivo reads the funder's requirements, keeps them beside your draft, and tells you where a reviewer will push back.
Free to start. No card required.
The program aims to train up to 500 emerging creatives during the grant period, with a focus on underserved communities.
Section 2 puts your instructional capacity at 120 per year. A reviewer will read 500 as unsupported.
State the delivery model that reaches 500, or revise the figure to match the capacity you declared.
What it does
Built for how grants are assessed.
Suggestions attach to the lines that need work and are weighed against this funder, so you fix them in the draft — not a chat window.
- Marked on the line they concern
- Weighed against this funder
- Accepted in place
Outcomes and evaluation
The program aims to train up to 500 emerging creatives during the grant period, with a focus on underserved communities.
Section 2 puts your instructional capacity at 120 per year. A reviewer will read 500 as unsupported.
State the delivery model that reaches 500, or revise the figure to match the capacity you declared.
Cross-checked against Section 2 of this draft
Funder research
Know who you are applying to before you start.
Every profile covers giving history, award sizes, financial position, and whether the funder takes unsolicited proposals. Free to search, no account needed.
| Foundation | Assets | Annual giving | Median grant |
|---|---|---|---|
Cedar Hill Family Foundation Cleveland, OHEducationOpen to unsolicited | $18.2M | $2.4M | $16K |
Bright Harbor Trust Austin, TXHuman services | $44.1M | $3.8M | $25K |
Delano Community Fund Sacramento, CAYouth developmentOpen to unsolicited | $7.6M | $910K | $9K |
Example records, shown to illustrate the profile fields.
Browse the directoryComparison
Why not a general AI assistant?
A grant application has a specific reader, published requirements, and a fixed deadline. Most of the work is keeping all three in view while you write.
The proposal lives in a chat window. Revisions are copied out, edited elsewhere, and pasted back in.
You write in a document editor. Suggestions attach to the relevant lines and are resolved in place.
Guidelines are reintroduced at the start of each session, or lose prominence as the draft grows.
Guidelines are added once. The funder's requirements remain visible beside the draft throughout.
Feedback reflects what is generally true of grant proposals.
Review is weighed against the specific funder you are addressing and the requirements of this application.
Organization details and funder context must be restated in every session.
Your organization and the funder are configured once and applied to each proposal.
Pricing
Free to write in. Credits when the AI works.
Every plan has every feature. Reviews, chat and inline suggestions all draw from the same balance. The only difference is how many credits you get.
10credits· free
50credits· $29
150credits· $79
400credits· $179
Ten credits to start. No card required. Credits do not expire.
Questions
Common questions.
If something is not covered here, the documentation goes into more detail and contacting us reaches a person.
Get in touchIt is a document editor built around how grant applications are assessed. It turns a funder's guidelines into a working checklist, reviews the draft against them as you write, and keeps a measure of how close each proposal is to finished.